Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- getting_started [2018/01/24 21:40]
pklapetek
+++ getting_started [2018/01/25 12:33] (current)
pklapetek
@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
-A very minimum set needed for a reasonable calculation is shown here. It consist of three files: parameter file, sample geometry definition file and table of material parameters.
+A very minimum set needed for a reasonable calculation is shown here. It consist of three files: parameter file, sample geometry definition file and table of material parameters. You can paste the content below to newly created files or you can {{samples:getting_started.tar.gz|download them}}.
 test.par:
 <code>
+POOL
+e-9 3e-9 3e-9
+MEDIUM_VECTOR_SAMPLE
+100 100 test.vector test.table
+COMP
+.4 90 100 0.359e-9
+OUTPUT
+out.vtk
+STRIP_OUTPUT
+SOURCE_METHOD
+RAYS
+1000000
+PHASES
+YBND
+-1 1 20
 </code>
-test.mat:
+test.vector:
 <code>
+50 50 40 20 1
+0 0 0 100 100 20 2
 </code>
 test.table:
 <code>
+0 1  0 0 0
+99 Ag 0 0
+99 Si 0 0
 </code>
+Now, run the solver from command line with test.par as an argument.
+After a while, you should get the results. Open the file out.vtk in [[http://paraview.org|Paraview]]
+and you should see something like this:
+{{ :started.png?400 |}}
+This is nearly all what we can expect - at least for the basic calculation. We get the standing wave distribution within the object and we get a sum of the electric field intensity in each material. Running this for different wavelengths gives us similar information like the experiments.

Xraytrace documentation